The World Diamond Council (WDC) Statement On Zimbabwe Diamonds From Marange
Background:
In this press release, we learn that the situation in Zimbabwe is so terrible that even the WDC, which makes massive amounts of money from the misery of small scale diamond diggers, is hesitating to jump on the money train. This hesitancy was lacking when millions of Africans were killed during the blood diamond wars just fifteen years ago, so perhaps we should consider this press release a sign of progress from the very organization that for the most part stood by and watched while this previous atrocity was taking place.
Every ethical jeweler I know is against Zimbabwe diamonds entering the supply chain. Yet that is exactly what is happening now and it will continue indefinitely into the future. Kimberly Process certifies Zim’s blood diamonds as “conflict free.”
See the press release below. Marc Choyt, Publisher, Fairjewelry.org
***
NEW YORK: FEBRUARY 3, 2011 – “On 17 January 2011, through prescribed procedure, member governments of the Kimberley Process gave their agreement to a document that would allow for the recommencement of exports from approved concessions in the Marange region of Zimbabwe. As outlined in the document, this approval is subject to agreement on continued oversight and monitoring.
Before exports can resume, however, the authorities in Zimbabwe need to complete a series on consultations with Mr. Mathieu Yamba, the Chair of the Kimberley Process, representing the Democratic Republic of Congo.
We believe these consultations are sensitive and ongoing. Mr. Yamba has called for understanding and patience as efforts are made, in good faith, on all sides to reach a conclusion.
In the meantime, we continue to advise members of the diamond industry that until a conclusion is reached, exports of stocks and production from the approved concessions in Marange do not carry the approval of the Kimberley Process.
We, therefore, advocate caution and the adoption of due diligence when trading rough diamonds on the international market.
We will advise you as soon as the consultations have been concluded and a clear directive has been received from the Chair.”
Please Note:
FJA is a forum open to a diversity of opinions in support of it’s mission. Any editorial expressed in this article represents the opinion of the author, and not necessarily the views of Fair Jewelry Action members.
